To preserve,
protect and enhance the heritage and rural character of the North
Shore
of Oahu, Hawaii, in partnership
with communities from Kaena Point to Kahaluu.
Supreme Court Will be
Asked to Review Lower Court
Rulings
The Hawaii Supreme
Court will be asked to review the
Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA)
split decision regarding the need for a Supplemental Environmental
Impact
Statement (SEIS) on the Turtle Bay Resort Expansion Project.
On May 22, 2009, in a
2-1 decision, the ICA agreed with the Circuit Court's decision that
since the total number of resort units is unchanged 23 years
later, no further review of potential impacts is
required.
Of course, the resort
does not exist in a vacuum and potential changes in impacts of the
expansion and within the vicinity should not be blindly disregarded.
The ICA Dissenting
Opinion notes, “The overriding purpose of HEPA (Hawaii Environmental
Protection Act) is
to ensure that an agency is provided with relevant information about
the
environmental impacts of a proposed project so that the agency can make
informed decisions about the project.”
Also, “DPP failed to
consider appropriate factors and follow
correct procedures in deciding not to require an SEIS.” Under
Kuilima and DPP’s interpretation of the
law, “the 1985 EIS would remain valid in perpetuity and no SEIS could
ever be
required, so long as no substantive changes to the design of the
project were
made.” This interpretation leads to absurd
conclusions.
The Supreme Court
will be asked to review the ICA’s
split decision to resolve the issues specific to this case and to help
ensure
proper interpretation of environmental law for future decision making.
Will you help us with
a tax-deductible donation
today?
We need your help to continue this legal battle.
Resort Expansion Planning
Continues
Stanford Carr, the Interim Management
Officer for Kuilima Resort Company, continues to push forward the very
unpopular resort expansion plan, currently under a fourth extension of
the 2006 Tentative Subdivision Approval.
The widening of Kuilima Drive from two to four lanes is one of the
final conditions before final approval can be realized.
Another condition not yet met is satisfaction of Department of
Transportation requirements.
Meanwhile, the foreclosure action by the resort creditors appears to be
on indefinite hold and there is no news from the Turtle Bay Advisory
Working Group. Planning for major resort expansion continues.
Ko`olauloa-North
Shore Alliance
A new network of
26 supporting organizations have come together to support the Turtle
Bay Initiative.Go to the Alliance
website
With so much news
about the Governor's plan to buy the Turtle Bay Resort and preserve the
adjoining lands, the foreclosure action and our strong legal challenge
for a supplemental EIS, it
might be easy to forget that our legal
efforts require a substantial amount of money.
Everyone
has a different ability to help. Some help by volunteering their
time, while others donate what they can comfortably give. Some
folks have greater means and have donated thousands of dollars.
Others have helped out with donations as small as one dollar.
What
is it worth to you to help Keep the North Shore Country?
Another way to look
at it is this: If someone can afford to go out to dinner from time to
time, they can probably afford to donate the equivalent of one night
out, can't they?
The
Case for the Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement
Intuitively,
logically, ethically and responsibly, everyone
knows that a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) should
be prepared
before the developers at Turtle Bay Resort are allowed to
proceed.
We believe the courts will add “legally” to
this list of reasons.
According
to Kuilima Resort Company, the folks who want to
expand Turtle Bay Resort on Oahu’s North Shore from 500
to 4000 hotel and
condo units, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) completed in 1985
is as valid
today as it may have been 21 years ago.
Inconveniently
for the developers, virtually nobody has come
out in support of the project as proposed, while the list of opponents
is overwhelming.
The
City's Department of Planning and Permitting has an obligation to
require a Supplemental EIS when new circumstances or evidence have
brought to light different or likely increased environmental impacts
not previously dealth with. DPP must make an independant
determination whether new circumstancces and evidence require an SEIS.
Kuilima
applied for subdivision approval, which requires discretionary consent
from the City.
New
circumstances and evidence have brough to light likely increased
significant environmental impacts.
DPP
failed to take a hard look at new circumstances and evidence.
Keep
the North Shore Country is committed to ensuring the City's
compliance with Hawaii enironmental law. This application for
subdivision approval is the classic example of when a Supplemental EIS
should be conducted.
This
legal challenge against a well funded developer and the City is
expensive, yet so very important to the future of Oahu and the State of
Hawaii.
Get
your own bumper sticker by sending a self-addressed-stamped-envelop to:
Keep the North Shore
Country 66-250
Kamehameha Hwy, Ste D103 Haleiwa,
HI 96712
Including
a few bucks or a check to help pay our legal bills would be much
appreciated. Thank you for showing your support!
Have you viewed the
other
pages?
Our
List of Supporters continues to grow as more and more people hear about
our organization. If you have not done so already, it is very
quick and easy to register as
a Supporter.
Have
you seen the aerial and beach Photos
of Kawela Bay?
Go
to the Forum
to read Supporter comments and post new comments.
The News
page contains news articles, links and useful bits of information.
Donations
large and small are much appreciated. We have substantial
expenses and every little bit helps, so thank you for whatever help you
can offer. Thanks
again for your support and interest.
Keep
the North Shore Country, along with Sierra Club, Hawaii Chapter, is
involved in a legal challenge with Kuilima Resort Company, an Oaktree
Capital Management, LLC, company, and the City and County of Honolulu
Department of Planning and Permitting over the need to require a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Turtle Bay
Resort Expansion. The underlying Environmental Impact Statement
was completed in 1985 and the developer now wants to proceed with a
project that was approved in 1986. Read the News section of this
website for details.